SendGrid vs Sparkpost
Compare SendGrid and Sparkpost based on observed API performance, features, and pricing
Live performance comparison
Real-world performance data from messages sent through Knock
| Provider | Message volume | Growth | Status page updates (30d) | Status page updates (90d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500M+ | 2nd of 10 → | 0 | 0 |
| <1M | 10th of 10 → | 0 | 0 |
From January 22nd to April 22nd, Knock routed 500M+ messages through SendGrid and <1M through Sparkpost. SendGrid reported 0 status page updates over the last 90 days, while Sparkpost reported 0.
Response time
Response time measures how long each provider takes to accept an API request from Knock, including connection overhead and any automatic retries. Lower values mean faster message hand-off.
The chart above shows each provider's daily median response time (p50) from January 22nd to April 22nd. The top-line number is an average of these daily values: SendGrid averaged 22ms compared to 285ms for Sparkpost. SendGrid's highest daily p50 was 24ms; Sparkpost's was 336ms. SendGrid is 263ms faster at the median, which can add up at high volumes.
The 90th percentile (p90) captures the slowest 10% of requests, revealing how each provider handles moderate stress. Averaged across all days, SendGrid has a p90 of 75ms compared to 348ms for Sparkpost. The highest daily p90 was 98ms for SendGrid and 402ms for Sparkpost. SendGrid handles these slower requests 273ms faster, suggesting more consistent performance across the board.
The 99th percentile (p99) represents the long tail — the slowest 1% of requests. Averaged across all days, SendGrid reached 463ms at p99 while Sparkpost reached 551ms. The highest daily p99 was 1255ms for SendGrid and 31566ms for Sparkpost, indicating the worst-case response time during spikes or provider-side congestion. SendGrid shows a tighter tail, which may matter for time-sensitive notifications like one-time passwords or real-time alerts where even rare delays can impact user experience.
Error rate
Error rate tracks the ratio of 5xx responses and timeouts to total requests. Knock automatically retries failed requests, so transient provider errors rarely affect end-user delivery.
| Provider | Avg. daily error rate | Highest daily rate | Peak error date | Zero-error days | Days above 0.01% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00% | 0.02% | Feb 18 | 84 | 2 |
| 0.19% | 3.41% | Feb 24 | 90 | 1 |
Averaged across the date range, SendGrid shows a 0.00% daily error rate compared to 0.19% for Sparkpost. The highest single-day error rate was 0.02% for SendGrid and 3.41% for Sparkpost. SendGrid demonstrates a lower error rate, indicating slightly more consistent availability during this period. Knock automatically retries failed requests to both providers, minimizing the impact of transient errors on end-user delivery.
About these metrics: Data represents messages sent through Knock during the specified period. Response time measures time from Knock to provider acceptance. Error rate includes only provider 5xx responses and timeouts.
Recent SendGrid incidents
Recent status page incidents for SendGrid
No incidents reported in the last 90 days
Recent Sparkpost incidents
Recent status page incidents for Sparkpost
No incidents reported in the last 90 days
Pros and cons
SendGrid
Sparkpost
Pros
- Comprehensive documentation with SDKs for most major languages
- Rich analytics tools with programmatic API access to engagement data
- Strong focus on deliverability with AI-powered intelligent delivery
- Trusted by Uber, Booking.com, and Yelp for high-volume sending
Pros
- Delivers nearly 40% of all commercial email worldwide
- Subaccount support for isolated sending streams under one billing account
- On-premise mail sending solution available for very high volume workloads
- Great analytics tools with predictive health scores for email deliverability
Cons
- Extended email activity history requires a paid add-on
- Pricing can become complex at higher volumes
- Support response times vary by plan tier
Cons
- Documentation can be hard to navigate with less beginner-friendly getting started content
- Higher price point than basic providers
- Now part of Bird (formerly MessageBird), which may affect product direction
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between SendGrid and Sparkpost?
SendGrid is a cloud-based email delivery platform owned by Twilio, known for high-volume transactional and marketing email. SparkPost is a data-driven email delivery platform with advanced analytics and predictive tools for high-volume senders. SendGrid is best suited for high-volume transactional + marketing, while Sparkpost is geared toward data-driven, high-volume.
Which is cheaper, SendGrid or Sparkpost?
Free tier includes up to 100 emails per day for 60 days. Paid plans start at $19.95/month for 50,000 emails on the Essentials plan, with an Essentials 100K tier at $34.95/month. Pro plans with dedicated IPs start at $249/month for 300,000 emails. Free tier includes 500 emails per month with community support. Paid plans start at $20/month for 50,000 emails with premium deliverability features. The best value depends on your sending volume. Use the pricing calculator above to compare costs at your expected volume.
Which is faster, SendGrid or Sparkpost?
Based on real-world data from Knock, SendGrid has a median API response time (p50) of 22ms compared to 285ms for Sparkpost.
Which is more reliable, SendGrid or Sparkpost?
From January 22nd to April 22nd, SendGrid showed an error rate of 0.00% while Sparkpost showed 0.19%. Both rates are within acceptable thresholds for production email delivery, and Knock automatically retries failed requests to minimize the impact of transient errors.
Which is more popular, SendGrid or Sparkpost?
On the Knock platform, SendGrid handled 500M+ messages from January 22nd to April 22nd compared to <1M for Sparkpost. SendGrid volume has remained stable, while Sparkpost volume has remained stable.
Can I use both SendGrid and Sparkpost together?
Yes. Knock enables you to integrate multiple email providers into a single notification workflow. You can use SendGrid and Sparkpost side by side, route traffic between them, or migrate from one to the other without changing your application code.
What are the main pros and cons of SendGrid vs Sparkpost?
SendGrid strengths include comprehensive documentation with sdks for most major languages and rich analytics tools with programmatic api access to engagement data. Sparkpost strengths include delivers nearly 40% of all commercial email worldwide and subaccount support for isolated sending streams under one billing account. On the other hand, SendGrid drawbacks include extended email activity history requires a paid add-on, while Sparkpost drawbacks include documentation can be hard to navigate with less beginner-friendly getting started content.
Use either provider with Knock
Knock enables you to integrate SendGrid, Sparkpost, or any combination of email providers into a single notification workflow. Manage templates, orchestrate cross-channel delivery, and switch providers without changing your code.