Postmark vs SendGrid
Compare Postmark and SendGrid based on observed API performance, features, and pricing
Live performance comparison
Real-world performance data from messages sent through Knock
| Provider | Message volume | Growth | Status page updates (30d) | Status page updates (90d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25M–100M | 4th of 10 → | 5 | 12 |
| 500M+ | 2nd of 10 → | 0 | 0 |
From May 24th to August 22nd, Knock routed 25M–100M messages through Postmark and 500M+ through SendGrid. Postmark reported 12 status page updates over the last 90 days, while SendGrid reported 0.
Response time
Response time measures how long each provider takes to accept an API request from Knock, including connection overhead and any automatic retries. Lower values mean faster message hand-off.
The chart above shows each provider's daily median response time (p50) from May 24th to August 22nd. The top-line number is an average of these daily values: Postmark averaged 9ms compared to 21ms for SendGrid. Postmark's highest daily p50 was 62ms; SendGrid's was 36ms. Postmark is 12ms faster at the median, which can add up at high volumes.
The 90th percentile (p90) captures the slowest 10% of requests, revealing how each provider handles moderate stress. Averaged across all days, Postmark has a p90 of 83ms compared to 77ms for SendGrid. The highest daily p90 was 222ms for Postmark and 89ms for SendGrid. Both providers show similar performance at this percentile, indicating comparable consistency.
The 99th percentile (p99) represents the long tail — the slowest 1% of requests. Averaged across all days, Postmark reached 444ms at p99 while SendGrid reached 235ms. The highest daily p99 was 8081ms for Postmark and 1758ms for SendGrid, indicating the worst-case response time during spikes or provider-side congestion. SendGrid shows a tighter tail, which may matter for time-sensitive notifications like one-time passwords or real-time alerts where even rare delays can impact user experience.
Error rate
Error rate tracks the ratio of 5xx responses and timeouts to total requests. Knock automatically retries failed requests, so transient provider errors rarely affect end-user delivery.
| Provider | Avg. daily error rate | Highest daily rate | Peak error date | Zero-error days | Days above 0.01% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01% | 0.08% | Jul 24 | 72 | 15 |
| 0.00% | 0.00% | May 24 | 91 | 0 |
Averaged across the date range, Postmark shows a 0.01% daily error rate compared to 0.00% for SendGrid. The highest single-day error rate was 0.08% for Postmark and 0.00% for SendGrid. Both providers show similar reliability levels, with error rates well within acceptable thresholds. Knock automatically retries failed requests to both providers, minimizing the impact of transient errors on end-user delivery.
About these metrics: Data represents messages sent through Knock during the specified period. Response time measures time from Knock to provider acceptance. Error rate includes only provider 5xx responses and timeouts.
Recent Postmark incidents
Recent status page incidents for Postmark
Started Aug 18, 2026 — Resolved Aug 19, 2026
The issue is now fully resolved. We are continuing to improve our systems, observability, and monitoring to prevent future occurrences. Thank you for your patience. Starting August 18th at ~9:34am CT (~14:34 UTC), Postmark experienced delays in delivering open webhook events. New open events resumed delivery on August 19th at ~8:47am CT (~13:47 UTC), and all backlogged events completed re-delivery at ~4:52pm CT (~21:52 UTC).
Started Aug 18, 2026 — Resolved Aug 18, 2026
The maintenance is now complete. Thanks for your patience.
Started Aug 14, 2026 — Resolved Aug 15, 2026
The issue has been resolved after additional monitoring into the early morning. Thank you for your patience.
Started Aug 7, 2026 — Resolved Aug 7, 2026
The maintenance is now complete. Thanks for your patience.
Started Jul 27, 2026 — Resolved Jul 28, 2026
The scheduled maintenance is now underway. We'll keep you updated on our progress.
Recent SendGrid incidents
Recent status page incidents for SendGrid
No incidents reported in the last 90 days
Pros and cons
Postmark
SendGrid
Pros
- Excellent deliverability with separate infrastructure for transactional and bulk messages
- Publishes time-to-inbox data across major email providers for transparency
- Great documentation with official and community-supported SDKs for all major languages
- 45-day message and log retention on all plans
Pros
- Comprehensive documentation with SDKs for most major languages
- Rich analytics tools with programmatic API access to engagement data
- Strong focus on deliverability with AI-powered intelligent delivery
- Trusted by Uber, Booking.com, and Yelp for high-volume sending
Cons
- No visual drag-and-drop email editor
- Less suited for high-volume marketing email
- Smaller feature set compared to all-in-one platforms
Cons
- Extended email activity history requires a paid add-on
- Pricing can become complex at higher volumes
- Support response times vary by plan tier
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Postmark and SendGrid?
Postmark is a transactional email service focused on fast, reliable delivery with transparent pricing. SendGrid is a cloud-based email delivery platform owned by Twilio, known for high-volume transactional and marketing email. Postmark is best suited for transactional email, while SendGrid is geared toward high-volume transactional + marketing.
Which is cheaper, Postmark or SendGrid?
Free tier includes 100 emails per month. Paid plans start at $15/month for 10,000 emails with overages at $1.80/1K up to 125K, and $1.70/1K at 300K+. Free tier includes up to 100 emails per day for 60 days. Paid plans start at $19.95/month for 50,000 emails on the Essentials plan, with an Essentials 100K tier at $34.95/month. Pro plans with dedicated IPs start at $249/month for 300,000 emails. The best value depends on your sending volume. Use the pricing calculator above to compare costs at your expected volume.
Which is faster, Postmark or SendGrid?
Based on real-world data from Knock, Postmark has a median API response time (p50) of 9ms compared to 21ms for SendGrid.
Which is more reliable, Postmark or SendGrid?
From May 24th to August 22nd, Postmark showed an error rate of 0.01% while SendGrid showed 0.00%. Both rates are within acceptable thresholds for production email delivery, and Knock automatically retries failed requests to minimize the impact of transient errors.
Which is more popular, Postmark or SendGrid?
On the Knock platform, Postmark handled 25M–100M messages from May 24th to August 22nd compared to 500M+ for SendGrid. Postmark volume has remained stable, while SendGrid volume has remained stable.
Can I use both Postmark and SendGrid together?
Yes. Knock enables you to integrate multiple email providers into a single notification workflow. You can use Postmark and SendGrid side by side, route traffic between them, or migrate from one to the other without changing your application code.
What are the main pros and cons of Postmark vs SendGrid?
Postmark strengths include excellent deliverability with separate infrastructure for transactional and bulk messages and publishes time-to-inbox data across major email providers for transparency. SendGrid strengths include comprehensive documentation with sdks for most major languages and rich analytics tools with programmatic api access to engagement data. On the other hand, Postmark drawbacks include no visual drag-and-drop email editor, while SendGrid drawbacks include extended email activity history requires a paid add-on.
Use either provider with Knock
Knock enables you to integrate Postmark, SendGrid, or any combination of email providers into a single notification workflow. Manage templates, orchestrate cross-channel delivery, and switch providers without changing your code.