Postmark vs Resend
Compare Postmark and Resend based on observed API performance, features, and pricing
Live performance comparison
Real-world performance data from messages sent through Knock
| Provider | Message volume | Growth | Status page updates (30d) | Status page updates (90d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25M–100M | 4th of 10 → | 6 | 13 |
| 10M–25M | 1st of 10 → | 7 | 31 |
From January 22nd to April 22nd, Knock routed 25M–100M messages through Postmark and 10M–25M through Resend. Postmark reported 13 status page updates over the last 90 days, while Resend reported 31.
Response time
Response time measures how long each provider takes to accept an API request from Knock, including connection overhead and any automatic retries. Lower values mean faster message hand-off.
The chart above shows each provider's daily median response time (p50) from January 22nd to April 22nd. The top-line number is an average of these daily values: Postmark averaged 27ms compared to 78ms for Resend. Postmark's highest daily p50 was 57ms; Resend's was 96ms. Postmark is 51ms faster at the median, which can add up at high volumes.
The 90th percentile (p90) captures the slowest 10% of requests, revealing how each provider handles moderate stress. Averaged across all days, Postmark has a p90 of 90ms compared to 123ms for Resend. The highest daily p90 was 143ms for Postmark and 149ms for Resend. Postmark handles these slower requests 33ms faster, suggesting more consistent performance across the board.
The 99th percentile (p99) represents the long tail — the slowest 1% of requests. Averaged across all days, Postmark reached 237ms at p99 while Resend reached 356ms. The highest daily p99 was 38235ms for Postmark and 10020ms for Resend, indicating the worst-case response time during spikes or provider-side congestion. Postmark shows a tighter tail, which may matter for time-sensitive notifications like one-time passwords or real-time alerts where even rare delays can impact user experience.
Error rate
Error rate tracks the ratio of 5xx responses and timeouts to total requests. Knock automatically retries failed requests, so transient provider errors rarely affect end-user delivery.
| Provider | Avg. daily error rate | Highest daily rate | Peak error date | Zero-error days | Days above 0.01% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.03% | 2.37% | Mar 27 | 84 | 4 |
| 0.07% | 2.45% | Feb 15 | 80 | 8 |
Averaged across the date range, Postmark shows a 0.03% daily error rate compared to 0.07% for Resend. The highest single-day error rate was 2.37% for Postmark and 2.45% for Resend. Both providers show similar reliability levels, with error rates well within acceptable thresholds. Knock automatically retries failed requests to both providers, minimizing the impact of transient errors on end-user delivery.
About these metrics: Data represents messages sent through Knock during the specified period. Response time measures time from Knock to provider acceptance. Error rate includes only provider 5xx responses and timeouts.
Recent Postmark incidents
Recent status page incidents for Postmark
Started Apr 21, 2026 — Resolved Apr 21, 2026
Good news - this issue has been resolved and everything should be working normally now. We're continuing to monitor closely to make sure everything stays stable. Thank you so much for your patience while we worked through this.
Started Apr 8, 2026 — Resolved Apr 9, 2026
**[UPDATE]** We determined that yesterday's network instability was caused by a widespread Google (Gmail) outage. You can find more information on Google’s Status Dashboard here: https://www.google.com/appsstatus/dashboard/incidents/224ozRqzW4sFBDK8hLnT We will share an additional update regarding our internal action items later today.
Started Apr 2, 2026 — Resolved Apr 3, 2026
**[UPDATE]** On **April 2nd** starting at **~07:00pm UTC**, Postmark experienced an incident that resulted in delayed message delivery and webhook notifications for some customers. The issue was caused by an infrastructure configuration change that disrupted internal mail routing. While messages were safely queued in a "Processing" state, they were not delivered until the routing configuration was restored. Service was restored on **April 3rd at ~4:20am UTC** and the backlog of queued message
Started Mar 27, 2026 — Resolved Mar 28, 2026
We've resolved the incident. Thanks for your patience.
Started Mar 26, 2026 — Resolved Mar 26, 2026
The issue has been resolved.
Recent Resend incidents
Recent status page incidents for Resend
Started Apr 15, 2026 — Resolved Apr 15, 2026
Status: Resolved The pending domain verifications and broadcasts are catching-up quickly. The incident should fully resolve soon. Affected components Dashboard (Operational) Broadcast Emails (Operational) General API (Operational)
Started Apr 10, 2026 — Resolved Apr 10, 2026
Status: Resolved We have resolved the underlying issue and service has been resumed. Affected components General API (Operational) Single Email (Operational) SMTP (Operational) Broadcast Emails (Operational) Batch Emails (Operational)
Started Apr 3, 2026 — Resolved Apr 3, 2026
Status: Resolved We have resolved the underlying issue and service has been resumed. Affected components Single Email (Operational) SMTP (Operational) Batch Emails (Operational)
Started Apr 2, 2026 — Resolved Apr 2, 2026
Status: Resolved We have resolved the underlying issue and service has been resumed. Affected components Single Email (Operational) Dashboard (Operational) Email Events (Operational) SMTP (Operational) General API (Operational) Webhooks (Operational) Website (Operational) Broadcast Emails (Operational) Batch Emails (Operational)
Started Mar 28, 2026 — Resolved Mar 28, 2026
Status: Resolved We have resolved the issue causing increased latency in email sending. Emails are being delivered normally. Affected components Single Email (Operational) Broadcast Emails (Operational) Batch Emails (Operational)
Pros and cons
Postmark
Resend
Pros
- Excellent deliverability with separate infrastructure for transactional and bulk messages
- Publishes time-to-inbox data across major email providers for transparency
- Great documentation with official and community-supported SDKs for all major languages
- 45-day message and log retention on all plans
Pros
- Beautiful documentation with attention to detail and great developer experience
- Created and maintain React Email, the go-to framework for building email templates in React
- Minimalist, developer-optimized platform that avoids bloat with a focused UI
- Transparent observability with real-time visibility into sends, failures, and engagement
Cons
- No visual drag-and-drop email editor
- Less suited for high-volume marketing email
- Smaller feature set compared to all-in-one platforms
Cons
- Newer and less battle-tested compared to incumbents like Mailgun or SendGrid
- Fewer enterprise features than established providers
- Limited marketing email capabilities
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Postmark and Resend?
Postmark is a transactional email service focused on fast, reliable delivery with transparent pricing. Resend is a modern email API built for developers, with React Email support and a focus on simplicity. Postmark is best suited for transactional email, while Resend is geared toward developer-first, react teams.
Which is cheaper, Postmark or Resend?
Free tier includes 100 emails per month. Paid plans start at $15/month for 10,000 emails with overages at $1.80/1K up to 125K, and $1.70/1K at 300K+. Free tier includes 3,000 emails per month and 100 emails per day. Paid plans start at $20/month for 50,000 emails with overages at $0.90/1K on Pro, scaling down to $0.46/1K on Scale 2.5M. The best value depends on your sending volume. Use the pricing calculator above to compare costs at your expected volume.
Which is faster, Postmark or Resend?
Based on real-world data from Knock, Postmark has a median API response time (p50) of 27ms compared to 78ms for Resend.
Which is more reliable, Postmark or Resend?
From January 22nd to April 22nd, Postmark showed an error rate of 0.03% while Resend showed 0.07%. Both rates are within acceptable thresholds for production email delivery, and Knock automatically retries failed requests to minimize the impact of transient errors.
Which is more popular, Postmark or Resend?
On the Knock platform, Postmark handled 25M–100M messages from January 22nd to April 22nd compared to 10M–25M for Resend. Postmark volume has remained stable, while Resend volume has remained stable.
Can I use both Postmark and Resend together?
Yes. Knock enables you to integrate multiple email providers into a single notification workflow. You can use Postmark and Resend side by side, route traffic between them, or migrate from one to the other without changing your application code.
What are the main pros and cons of Postmark vs Resend?
Postmark strengths include excellent deliverability with separate infrastructure for transactional and bulk messages and publishes time-to-inbox data across major email providers for transparency. Resend strengths include beautiful documentation with attention to detail and great developer experience and created and maintain react email, the go-to framework for building email templates in react. On the other hand, Postmark drawbacks include no visual drag-and-drop email editor, while Resend drawbacks include newer and less battle-tested compared to incumbents like mailgun or sendgrid.
Use either provider with Knock
Knock enables you to integrate Postmark, Resend, or any combination of email providers into a single notification workflow. Manage templates, orchestrate cross-channel delivery, and switch providers without changing your code.