Postmark vs Resend
Compare Postmark and Resend based on observed API performance, features, and pricing
Live performance comparison
Real-world performance data from messages sent through Knock
| Provider | Message volume | Growth | Status page updates (30d) | Status page updates (90d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 25M–100M | 4th of 10 → | 5 | 10 |
 | 10M–25M | 1st of 10 → | 10 | 29 |
From December 12th to March 12th, Knock routed 25M–100M messages through Postmark and 10M–25M through Resend. Postmark reported 10 status page updates over the last 90 days, while Resend reported 29.
Response time
Response time measures how long each provider takes to accept an API request from Knock, including connection overhead and any automatic retries. Lower values mean faster message hand-off.
The chart above shows each provider's daily median response time (p50) from December 12th to March 12th. The top-line number is an average of these daily values: Postmark averaged 33ms compared to 79ms for Resend. Postmark's highest daily p50 was 57ms; Resend's was 124ms. Postmark is 46ms faster at the median, which can add up at high volumes.
The 90th percentile (p90) captures the slowest 10% of requests, revealing how each provider handles moderate stress. Averaged across all days, Postmark has a p90 of 91ms compared to 137ms for Resend. The highest daily p90 was 112ms for Postmark and 186ms for Resend. Postmark handles these slower requests 46ms faster, suggesting more consistent performance across the board.
The 99th percentile (p99) represents the long tail — the slowest 1% of requests. Averaged across all days, Postmark reached 208ms at p99 while Resend reached 358ms. The highest daily p99 was 648ms for Postmark and 10020ms for Resend, indicating the worst-case response time during spikes or provider-side congestion. Postmark shows a tighter tail, which may matter for time-sensitive notifications like one-time passwords or real-time alerts where even rare delays can impact user experience.
Error rate
Error rate tracks the ratio of 5xx responses and timeouts to total requests. Knock automatically retries failed requests, so transient provider errors rarely affect end-user delivery.
| Provider | Avg. daily error rate | Highest daily rate | Peak error date | Zero-error days | Days above 0.01% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00% | 0.07% | Feb 4 | 85 | 4 |
| 0.07% | 2.45% | Feb 15 | 79 | 7 |
Averaged across the date range, Postmark shows a 0.00% daily error rate compared to 0.07% for Resend. The highest single-day error rate was 0.07% for Postmark and 2.45% for Resend. Postmark demonstrates a lower error rate, indicating slightly more consistent availability during this period. Knock automatically retries failed requests to both providers, minimizing the impact of transient errors on end-user delivery.
About these metrics: Data represents messages sent through Knock during the specified period. Response time measures time from Knock to provider acceptance. Error rate includes only provider 5xx responses and timeouts.
Recent Postmark incidents
Status page incidents from the last 30 days for Postmark
Started Mar 8, 2026 — Resolved Mar 8, 2026
Resolved! Thank you for your patience.
Started Mar 4, 2026 — Resolved Mar 4, 2026
We've now resolved the incident. Thanks for your patience.
Started Feb 26, 2026 — Resolved Feb 27, 2026
The incident has been resolved. Engineering will continue to monitor through the weekend. Long term system improvements and mitigation processes will continue to be a high priority effort. We appreciate and thank you for your patience.
Started Feb 23, 2026 — Resolved Feb 23, 2026
We've now resolved the incident. Thanks for your patience.
Started Feb 11, 2026 — Resolved Feb 12, 2026
We've resolved the issue. Thanks for your patience.
Recent Resend incidents
Status page incidents from the last 30 days for Resend
Started Mar 5, 2026 — Resolved Mar 5, 2026
Status: Resolved We have resolved the underlying issue and service has been resumed. Affected components Email Events (Operational)
Started Mar 3, 2026 — Resolved Mar 3, 2026
Status: Resolved We have resolved the underlying issue and service has been resumed. Affected components Batch Emails (Operational) Single Email (Operational) SMTP (Operational) Broadcast Emails (Operational)
Started Mar 2, 2026 — Resolved Mar 2, 2026
Status: Resolved Performance is back to normal. Affected components Batch Emails (Operational) Webhooks (Operational) Single Email (Operational) Dashboard (Operational) Email Events (Operational) SMTP (Operational) General API (Operational) Website (Operational) Broadcast Emails (Operational)
Started Feb 27, 2026 — Resolved Feb 27, 2026
Status: Resolved Performance is back to normal. Affected components Single Email (Operational) SMTP (Operational) Broadcast Emails (Operational) Batch Emails (Operational)
Started Feb 25, 2026 — Resolved Feb 25, 2026
Status: Resolved We have resolved the underlying issue and service has been resumed. Affected components Dashboard (Operational) Email Events (Operational) Broadcast Emails (Operational) Batch Emails (Operational) General API (Operational) Website (Operational) Single Email (Operational) SMTP (Operational) Webhooks (Operational)
Started Feb 24, 2026 — Resolved Feb 24, 2026
Status: Resolved We have resolved the underlying issue and service has been resumed. Affected components Single Email (Operational) SMTP (Operational) Broadcast Emails (Operational) Batch Emails (Operational)
Started Feb 17, 2026 — Resolved Feb 17, 2026
Status: Resolved This incident has been resolved. Email sending and dashboard performance are both operating normally. Thank you for your patience while we worked through this. Affected components SMTP (Operational) Broadcast Emails (Operational) Batch Emails (Operational) Single Email (Operational) Dashboard (Operational) Email Events (Operational)
Started Feb 16, 2026 — Resolved Feb 16, 2026
Status: Resolved We have resolved the underlying issue and service has been resumed. Affected components Broadcast Emails (Operational) Batch Emails (Operational) Single Email (Operational) Dashboard (Operational) SMTP (Operational)
Started Feb 13, 2026 — Resolved Feb 13, 2026
Status: Resolved We have resolved the underlying issue and service has been resumed. Affected components SMTP (Operational)
Started Feb 12, 2026 — Resolved Feb 12, 2026
Status: Resolved Service has been resumed. Affected components Broadcast Emails (Operational)
Pros and cons
Postmark
Resend
Pros
- Excellent deliverability with separate infrastructure for transactional and bulk messages
- Publishes time-to-inbox data across major email providers for transparency
- Great documentation with official and community-supported SDKs for all major languages
- 45-day message and log retention on all plans
Pros
- Beautiful documentation with attention to detail and great developer experience
- Created and maintain React Email, the go-to framework for building email templates in React
- Minimalist, developer-optimized platform that avoids bloat with a focused UI
- Transparent observability with real-time visibility into sends, failures, and engagement
Cons
- No visual drag-and-drop email editor
- Less suited for high-volume marketing email
- Smaller feature set compared to all-in-one platforms
Cons
- Newer and less battle-tested compared to incumbents like Mailgun or SendGrid
- Fewer enterprise features than established providers
- Limited marketing email capabilities
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Postmark and Resend?
Postmark is a transactional email service focused on fast, reliable delivery with transparent pricing. Resend is a modern email API built for developers, with React Email support and a focus on simplicity. Postmark is best suited for transactional email, while Resend is geared toward developer-first, react teams.
Which is cheaper, Postmark or Resend?
Free tier includes 100 emails per month. Paid plans start at $15/month for 10,000 emails with overages at $1.80/1K up to 125K, and $1.70/1K at 300K+. Free tier includes 3,000 emails per month and 100 emails per day. Paid plans start at $20/month for 50,000 emails with overages at $0.90/1K on Pro, scaling down to $0.46/1K on Scale 2.5M. The best value depends on your sending volume. Use the pricing calculator above to compare costs at your expected volume.
Which is faster, Postmark or Resend?
Based on real-world data from Knock, Postmark has a median API response time (p50) of 33ms compared to 79ms for Resend.
Which is more reliable, Postmark or Resend?
From December 12th to March 12th, Postmark showed an error rate of 0.00% while Resend showed 0.07%. Both rates are within acceptable thresholds for production email delivery, and Knock automatically retries failed requests to minimize the impact of transient errors.
Which is more popular, Postmark or Resend?
On the Knock platform, Postmark handled 25M–100M messages from December 12th to March 12th compared to 10M–25M for Resend. Postmark volume has remained stable, while Resend volume has remained stable.
Can I use both Postmark and Resend together?
Yes. Knock enables you to integrate multiple email providers into a single notification workflow. You can use Postmark and Resend side by side, route traffic between them, or migrate from one to the other without changing your application code.
What are the main pros and cons of Postmark vs Resend?
Postmark strengths include excellent deliverability with separate infrastructure for transactional and bulk messages and publishes time-to-inbox data across major email providers for transparency. Resend strengths include beautiful documentation with attention to detail and great developer experience and created and maintain react email, the go-to framework for building email templates in react. On the other hand, Postmark drawbacks include no visual drag-and-drop email editor, while Resend drawbacks include newer and less battle-tested compared to incumbents like mailgun or sendgrid.
Use either provider with Knock
Knock enables you to integrate Postmark, Resend, or any combination of email providers into a single notification workflow. Manage templates, orchestrate cross-channel delivery, and switch providers without changing your code.