Mandrill logo
vs
SendGrid logo

Mandrill vs SendGrid

Compare Mandrill and SendGrid based on observed API performance, features, and pricing

Share:

Live performance comparison

Real-world performance data from messages sent through Knock

Feb 10, 2026May 11, 2026
Updated daily
ProviderMessage volumeGrowthStatus page updates (30d)Status page updates (90d)
Mandrill
Mandrill
1M–10M
8th of 10 00
SendGrid
SendGrid
500M+
2nd of 10 1025

From February 10th to May 11th, Knock routed 1M–10M messages through Mandrill and 500M+ through SendGrid. Mandrill reported 0 status page updates over the last 90 days, while SendGrid reported 25.

Response time

Response time measures how long each provider takes to accept an API request from Knock, including connection overhead and any automatic retries. Lower values mean faster message hand-off.

ProviderMedian (p50)p90p95p99
Mandrill
Mandrill
137ms
373ms523ms872ms
SendGrid
SendGrid
22ms
76ms81ms421ms

The chart above shows each provider's daily median response time (p50) from February 10th to May 11th. The top-line number is an average of these daily values: Mandrill averaged 137ms compared to 22ms for SendGrid. Mandrill's highest daily p50 was 263ms; SendGrid's was 24ms. SendGrid is 115ms faster at the median, which can add up at high volumes.

The 90th percentile (p90) captures the slowest 10% of requests, revealing how each provider handles moderate stress. Averaged across all days, Mandrill has a p90 of 373ms compared to 76ms for SendGrid. The highest daily p90 was 524ms for Mandrill and 98ms for SendGrid. SendGrid handles these slower requests 297ms faster, suggesting more consistent performance across the board.

The 99th percentile (p99) represents the long tail — the slowest 1% of requests. Averaged across all days, Mandrill reached 872ms at p99 while SendGrid reached 421ms. The highest daily p99 was 1393ms for Mandrill and 6069ms for SendGrid, indicating the worst-case response time during spikes or provider-side congestion. SendGrid shows a tighter tail, which may matter for time-sensitive notifications like one-time passwords or real-time alerts where even rare delays can impact user experience.

Error rate

Error rate tracks the ratio of 5xx responses and timeouts to total requests. Knock automatically retries failed requests, so transient provider errors rarely affect end-user delivery.

ProviderAvg. daily error rateHighest daily ratePeak error dateZero-error daysDays above 0.01%
Mandrill
Mandrill
0.01%
0.43%Apr 27845
SendGrid
SendGrid
0.00%
0.02%Feb 18853

Averaged across the date range, Mandrill shows a 0.01% daily error rate compared to 0.00% for SendGrid. The highest single-day error rate was 0.43% for Mandrill and 0.02% for SendGrid. Both providers show similar reliability levels, with error rates well within acceptable thresholds. Knock automatically retries failed requests to both providers, minimizing the impact of transient errors on end-user delivery.

About these metrics: Data represents messages sent through Knock during the specified period. Response time measures time from Knock to provider acceptance. Error rate includes only provider 5xx responses and timeouts.

Recent Mandrill incidents

Recent status page incidents for Mandrill

No incidents reported in the last 90 days

Recent SendGrid incidents

Recent status page incidents for SendGrid

Started May 8, 2026 — Resolved May 8, 2026

May 8, 01:09 PDT Resolved - Our engineers have monitored the fix and confirmed the issue with Mail delay has been resolved. All services are now operating normally at this timeMay 8, 00:04 PDT Update - Our engineering team has identified the root cause of the issue and is actively working on a resolution. Please note that new Mail Send requests are processing as expected and are not impacted. We will share another update within the next two hours, or sooner if additional information becomes av

Started May 6, 2026 — Resolved May 6, 2026

May 6, 16:22 PDT Resolved - Our engineers have monitored the fix and confirmed the issue with Twilio SendGrid invoices and the tax amounts has been resolved. All services are now operating normally at this time.May 6, 15:04 PDT Monitoring - Our engineers have implemented a fix and are monitoring system performance. We have resolved the tax calculation issue, and customer invoices have been corrected with the appropriate tax amounts. If you were overcharged, your refund will be automatically pr

Started May 5, 2026 — Resolved May 5, 2026

May 5, 09:17 PDT Resolved - Our engineers have successfully completed processing all delayed Engagement Tracking and Segmentation data for Legacy Marketing Campaigns. All contact engagement data and segmentation features are now fully up-to-date and functioning normally. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this delay caused. This issue is now resolved, but if you experience any further issues please reach out to our SendGrid Technical Support Team for further assistance.May 4, 09:43 P

Started Apr 23, 2026 — Resolved Apr 23, 2026

Apr 23, 14:18 PDT Resolved - Our engineers have monitored the fix and confirmed the issue with module movement in the Design Editor has been resolved. All services are now operating normally at this time.Apr 23, 10:16 PDT Update - Our team is still investigating this issue, and we still don't have updates to provide. For now, latest recommendation persist: For the best experience, please use the latest version of Safari or Firefox while we work on a fix. We will provide another update as soon

Started Apr 18, 2026 — Resolved Apr 18, 2026

Apr 18, 13:07 PDT Resolved - Our engineers have investigated and resolved the issues with delayed delivery of emails for a subset of customers. From 12:05 pm PST to 12:45 pm PST customers may have seen a delay in the delivery of their emails. The issue has been resolved and all impacted services are operating normally.

Pros and cons

Mandrill
Mandrill

SendGrid
SendGrid

Pros

  • Friendly, well-laid-out developer documentation that makes integration straightforward
  • Global infrastructure for fast delivery with dedicated IPs and IP address pools
  • Solid analytics with reports on deliverability, opens, clicks, bounces, and rejections
  • Reuse Mailchimp templates for transactional email with deep ecosystem integration

Pros

  • Comprehensive documentation with SDKs for most major languages
  • Rich analytics tools with programmatic API access to engagement data
  • Strong focus on deliverability with AI-powered intelligent delivery
  • Trusted by Uber, Booking.com, and Yelp for high-volume sending

Cons

  • Requires an existing Mailchimp Standard or Premium subscription
  • Not available as a standalone service
  • Higher cost than some dedicated transactional services

Cons

  • Extended email activity history requires a paid add-on
  • Pricing can become complex at higher volumes
  • Support response times vary by plan tier

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Mandrill and SendGrid?

Mandrill is a transactional email add-on for Mailchimp, suited for teams already using the Mailchimp platform. SendGrid is a cloud-based email delivery platform owned by Twilio, known for high-volume transactional and marketing email. Mandrill is best suited for mailchimp users needing transactional, while SendGrid is geared toward high-volume transactional + marketing.

Which is cheaper, Mandrill or SendGrid?

Included as an add-on to Mailchimp Standard or Premium plans. Pricing is based on email blocks of 25,000 emails, starting at $20/block. Volume discounts apply: $18/block above 500K, scaling down to $10/block above 4M. Free tier includes up to 100 emails per day for 60 days. Paid plans start at $19.95/month for 50,000 emails on the Essentials plan, with an Essentials 100K tier at $34.95/month. Pro plans with dedicated IPs start at $249/month for 300,000 emails. The best value depends on your sending volume. Use the pricing calculator above to compare costs at your expected volume.

Which is faster, Mandrill or SendGrid?

Based on real-world data from Knock, Mandrill has a median API response time (p50) of 137ms compared to 22ms for SendGrid.

Which is more reliable, Mandrill or SendGrid?

From February 10th to May 11th, Mandrill showed an error rate of 0.01% while SendGrid showed 0.00%. Both rates are within acceptable thresholds for production email delivery, and Knock automatically retries failed requests to minimize the impact of transient errors.

Which is more popular, Mandrill or SendGrid?

On the Knock platform, Mandrill handled 1M–10M messages from February 10th to May 11th compared to 500M+ for SendGrid. Mandrill is currently trending upward in adoption, while SendGrid volume has remained stable.

Can I use both Mandrill and SendGrid together?

Yes. Knock enables you to integrate multiple email providers into a single notification workflow. You can use Mandrill and SendGrid side by side, route traffic between them, or migrate from one to the other without changing your application code.

What are the main pros and cons of Mandrill vs SendGrid?

Mandrill strengths include friendly, well-laid-out developer documentation that makes integration straightforward and global infrastructure for fast delivery with dedicated ips and ip address pools. SendGrid strengths include comprehensive documentation with sdks for most major languages and rich analytics tools with programmatic api access to engagement data. On the other hand, Mandrill drawbacks include requires an existing mailchimp standard or premium subscription, while SendGrid drawbacks include extended email activity history requires a paid add-on.

Use either provider with Knock

Knock enables you to integrate Mandrill, SendGrid, or any combination of email providers into a single notification workflow. Manage templates, orchestrate cross-channel delivery, and switch providers without changing your code.