Mailgun logo
vs
Postmark logo

Mailgun vs Postmark

Compare Mailgun and Postmark based on observed API performance, features, and pricing

Share:

Live performance comparison

Real-world performance data from messages sent through Knock

Jan 1, 2026Mar 31, 2026
Updated daily
ProviderMessage volumeGrowthStatus page updates (30d)Status page updates (90d)
Mailgun
Mailgun
100M–500M
5th of 10 23
Postmark
Postmark
25M–100M
4th of 10 511

From January 1st to March 31st, Knock routed 100M–500M messages through Mailgun and 25M–100M through Postmark. Mailgun reported 3 status page updates over the last 90 days, while Postmark reported 11.

Response time

Response time measures how long each provider takes to accept an API request from Knock, including connection overhead and any automatic retries. Lower values mean faster message hand-off.

ProviderMedian (p50)p90p95p99
Mailgun
Mailgun
125ms
182ms226ms386ms
Postmark
Postmark
31ms
93ms120ms242ms

The chart above shows each provider's daily median response time (p50) from January 1st to March 31st. The top-line number is an average of these daily values: Mailgun averaged 125ms compared to 31ms for Postmark. Mailgun's highest daily p50 was 147ms; Postmark's was 57ms. Postmark is 94ms faster at the median, which can add up at high volumes.

The 90th percentile (p90) captures the slowest 10% of requests, revealing how each provider handles moderate stress. Averaged across all days, Mailgun has a p90 of 182ms compared to 93ms for Postmark. The highest daily p90 was 220ms for Mailgun and 143ms for Postmark. Postmark handles these slower requests 89ms faster, suggesting more consistent performance across the board.

The 99th percentile (p99) represents the long tail — the slowest 1% of requests. Averaged across all days, Mailgun reached 386ms at p99 while Postmark reached 242ms. The highest daily p99 was 451ms for Mailgun and 38235ms for Postmark, indicating the worst-case response time during spikes or provider-side congestion. Postmark shows a tighter tail, which may matter for time-sensitive notifications like one-time passwords or real-time alerts where even rare delays can impact user experience.

Error rate

Error rate tracks the ratio of 5xx responses and timeouts to total requests. Knock automatically retries failed requests, so transient provider errors rarely affect end-user delivery.

ProviderAvg. daily error rateHighest daily ratePeak error dateZero-error daysDays above 0.01%
Mailgun
Mailgun
0.00%
0.03%Mar 17891
Postmark
Postmark
0.03%
2.37%Mar 27834

Averaged across the date range, Mailgun shows a 0.00% daily error rate compared to 0.03% for Postmark. The highest single-day error rate was 0.03% for Mailgun and 2.37% for Postmark. Both providers show similar reliability levels, with error rates well within acceptable thresholds. Knock automatically retries failed requests to both providers, minimizing the impact of transient errors on end-user delivery.

About these metrics: Data represents messages sent through Knock during the specified period. Response time measures time from Knock to provider acceptance. Error rate includes only provider 5xx responses and timeouts.

Recent Mailgun incidents

Recent status page incidents for Mailgun

Started Mar 19, 2026 — Resolved Mar 19, 2026

Mar 19, 11:53 PDT Resolved - A fix has been deployed and systems are back to normal.Mar 19, 11:43 PDT Identified - Some requests may be incorrectly failing with 401 error codes in our US region.

Started Mar 13, 2026 — Resolved Mar 13, 2026

Mar 13, 05:49 PDT Resolved - The incident has been resolved.Mar 13, 05:33 PDT Monitoring - A fix has been implemented and we are monitoring the results.Mar 13, 05:19 PDT Identified - The issue has been identified and a fix is being implemented.Mar 13, 04:56 PDT Update - We are continuing to investigate this issue.Mar 13, 04:29 PDT Investigating - We are currently investigating this issue.

Started Feb 25, 2026 — Resolved Feb 25, 2026

Feb 25, 13:45 PST Resolved - This incident has been resolved.Feb 25, 13:36 PST Monitoring - A fix has been implemented and we are monitoring the results.Feb 25, 12:25 PST Update - We are continuing to work on a fix for this issue.Feb 25, 11:47 PST Update - We are continuing to work on a fix for this issue.Feb 25, 11:30 PST Update - We are continuing to work on a fix for this issue.Feb 25, 11:29 PST Identified - Domain verification is also impacted. Increased chances of domain verification failin

Recent Postmark incidents

Recent status page incidents for Postmark

Started Mar 27, 2026 — Resolved Mar 28, 2026

We've resolved the incident. Thanks for your patience.

Started Mar 26, 2026 — Resolved Mar 26, 2026

The issue has been resolved.

Started Mar 25, 2026 — Resolved Mar 25, 2026

The issue has been resolved! Thank you for patience.

Started Mar 8, 2026 — Resolved Mar 8, 2026

Resolved! Thank you for your patience.

Started Mar 4, 2026 — Resolved Mar 4, 2026

We've now resolved the incident. Thanks for your patience.

Pros and cons

Mailgun
Mailgun

Postmark
Postmark

Pros

  • Well-written documentation with comprehensive guides and best practices for deliverability
  • Robust deliverability support with optional expert pairing to optimize sending
  • Powerful inbound email processing with customizable routing rules
  • Trusted by Lyft, American Express, and Wikipedia since 2010

Pros

  • Excellent deliverability with separate infrastructure for transactional and bulk messages
  • Publishes time-to-inbox data across major email providers for transparency
  • Great documentation with official and community-supported SDKs for all major languages
  • 45-day message and log retention on all plans

Cons

  • Requires familiarity with email protocols and API integrations
  • Pricing tiers can be confusing
  • Email template features are basic without the Mailjet editor

Cons

  • No visual drag-and-drop email editor
  • Less suited for high-volume marketing email
  • Smaller feature set compared to all-in-one platforms

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Mailgun and Postmark?

Mailgun is a developer-focused email API platform owned by Sinch, known for flexible sending and receiving capabilities. Postmark is a transactional email service focused on fast, reliable delivery with transparent pricing. Mailgun is best suited for developer-focused sending + receiving, while Postmark is geared toward transactional email.

Which is cheaper, Mailgun or Postmark?

Free tier includes 100 emails per day with no expiration. Paid plans start at $15/month for 10,000 emails with overages at $1.80/1K. Free tier includes 100 emails per month. Paid plans start at $15/month for 10,000 emails with overages at $1.80/1K up to 125K, and $1.70/1K at 300K+. The best value depends on your sending volume. Use the pricing calculator above to compare costs at your expected volume.

Which is faster, Mailgun or Postmark?

Based on real-world data from Knock, Mailgun has a median API response time (p50) of 125ms compared to 31ms for Postmark.

Which is more reliable, Mailgun or Postmark?

From January 1st to March 31st, Mailgun showed an error rate of 0.00% while Postmark showed 0.03%. Both rates are within acceptable thresholds for production email delivery, and Knock automatically retries failed requests to minimize the impact of transient errors.

Which is more popular, Mailgun or Postmark?

On the Knock platform, Mailgun handled 100M–500M messages from January 1st to March 31st compared to 25M–100M for Postmark. Mailgun volume has remained stable, while Postmark volume has remained stable.

Can I use both Mailgun and Postmark together?

Yes. Knock enables you to integrate multiple email providers into a single notification workflow. You can use Mailgun and Postmark side by side, route traffic between them, or migrate from one to the other without changing your application code.

What are the main pros and cons of Mailgun vs Postmark?

Mailgun strengths include well-written documentation with comprehensive guides and best practices for deliverability and robust deliverability support with optional expert pairing to optimize sending. Postmark strengths include excellent deliverability with separate infrastructure for transactional and bulk messages and publishes time-to-inbox data across major email providers for transparency. On the other hand, Mailgun drawbacks include requires familiarity with email protocols and api integrations, while Postmark drawbacks include no visual drag-and-drop email editor.

Use either provider with Knock

Knock enables you to integrate Mailgun, Postmark, or any combination of email providers into a single notification workflow. Manage templates, orchestrate cross-channel delivery, and switch providers without changing your code.